Photo by Ellen Miller
Showing posts with label John Shelk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Shelk. Show all posts

Friday, September 14, 2012

Plan to save Malheur Lumber Co. sawmill stems from unusual alliance


Plan to save Malheur Lumber Co. sawmill stems from unusual alliance
Published: Friday, September 14, 2012, 4:11 PM     Updated: Friday, September 14, 2012, 8:32 PM


JOHN DAY -- A new plan to keep an imperiled sawmill running and save up to 70 rural jobs emerged from work by Oregon's congressional delegation, Gov. John Kitzhaber and an improbable collection of veteran tree huggers, timber industry woods bosses, local leaders and the U.S. Forest Service. 

"Had you told me 10 years ago that I would be trying to keep a mill open in eastern Oregon, I would have said you're crazy, but things change," said Susan Jane Brown, Portland-based staff attorney for the Western Environmental Law Center. 

Timber industry
The situation in Grant County is a reminder of how far Oregon's once-booming timber industry has fallen.
Mills: Of 405 sawmills employing 45,778 Oregon workers in 1980, the state tallied only 106 mills and 15,708 workers by 2010, said Tom Partin of the American Forest Resources Council, a timber industry advocacy group.
Harvests: Since 1980, national forest timber harvests in Oregon have dropped from more than 3 billion board feet a year to about 500 million board feet a year now. On the Malheur National Forest over the same period, harvests declined from 228 million board feet to 29 million board feet, said Forest Service spokesman Tom Knappenberger.
The math: 1 million board feet equals 50 homes.
The Malheur Lumber Co. sawmill, the last one still operating in Grant County, will remain open past its planned November shutdown after the Forest Service promised to speed up timber sales and take other steps to increase forest restoration projects. 

The unlikely collaboration grew out of a growing sense that healing eastern Oregon's overgrown forests can't be done without sawmills, loggers and truck drivers to cut, remove and process logs. 

Traditional foes who have fought bitterly in the past over forest management now widely agree that eastern Oregon's unhealthy forests have become overstocked, bug-infested fuel factories for catastrophic wildfires. The status quo stems from harvest reductions designed to halt clearcutting and restore habitat and wildlife, including the northern spotted owl. Canopy closures now blot out sunlight across much of the region, reducing forage for deer, elk and ranchers' cattle. 

"We are pragmatists when it comes to restoration," said Sean Stevens, executive director of the environmental group, Oregon Wild. Loss of the 29-year-old Malheur Lumber Co. mill would be "a sad turn of events," he said. 

Grant County has even offered the federal government what may be an unprecedented deal in hopes of keeping the mill open: a proposal to loan money budgeted for county roads to the cash-strapped Forest Service to finance more restoration, thus making logs available for the mill. The Forest Service doesn't know if that's feasible.  

County landowners, at the same time, are offering to sell more private timber to the mill -- trees previously withheld from timber sales because the economic winds have blown prices into a deep hole. 

An ongoing shortage of timber from 1.7 million-acre Malheur National Forest continues to plague the mill. The local Forest Service budget has been too small to undertake forest restoration, cutting its supply. 

The mill ran out of timber for two months in spring 2011, and almost half the timber it processed last year was trucked in from Idaho, said Bruce Daucsavage of Prineville, president of the mill's corporate parent, the Ochoco Lumber Co. 

"I can sell all the pine we can possibly produce, assuming it's the right size," Daucsavage said. The mill needs 33 million board feet of pine greater than 8 inches in diameter per year to keep operating, he said. 

The new plan would direct $5 million in federal money to the Malheur forest immediately for forest restoration, including thinning and logging, brush mowing and the reintroduction of prescribed fires. The goal is to make about 60 million board feet of timber available for fiscal 2013 and 2014 on the Malheur. 

While some of that timber would be too small for the mill and much would be Douglas fir and grand fir rather than pine, that amount of cutting probably would keep the John Day sawmill operating and might even provide enough timber to reopen a Prairie Wood Products stud mill in nearby Prairie City that closed four years ago, said Grant County Commissioner Boyd Britton. 

GS.21MILL115-02.jpgView full size
"That would be the best of all worlds," Britton said Thursday. "If this is successful on the Malheur National Forest, it might be a successful model for the rest of the nation.:" 

The intervention follows work by Blue Mountains Forest Partners -- an industry-conservation-government group that formed in 2006 partly to undo damage caused by earlier mismanagement of the Malheur forest. 

"We spent a bunch of money in the 1980s building roads and harvesting very large, very valuable old-growth trees," Brown said, referring to earlier Forest Service policies. "Now we are faced with dealing with the leftovers, a fire-prone forest and the need to do necessary restoration work." 

Creating the partnership involved "a lot of time out in the field, looking at trees and talking about our feelings, which isn't easy for a lot of people," she said. A surprising level of trust was developed, she said. 

Proof: "Over the past six years, we have had no lawsuits over forest-related management," said Teresa Raaf, Malheur National Forest supervisor. 

boydbrittonJPGView full sizeJohn Day welder Boyd Britton, a Grant County commissioner, has been an outspoken advocate of saving his countyĆ¢€™s last sawmill by loaning reserve county road fund dollars to the U.S. Forest Service for forest restoration and the production of timber for the mill. Making that legal might take action by the Oregon Legislature, a Forest Service official said.
The Forest Service's mission no longer is to "get out the cut" as it was in the '80s, Raaf said. The focus now is to make it fire- and disease-resistant, with timber stands that are no longer overstocked with smaller trees, she said. 

All agree a mill shutdown would hit Grant County's 7,445 residents like a brick through a log truck window. 

Already struggling under 13.4 percent unemployment this summer, the county's population hubs at John Day and Canyon City are 80 miles from the nearest freeway, unusually remote even for eastern Oregon. Grant County is second in Oregon only to Crook County, which had a 14.1percent unemployment rate in July. The state's unemployment was 8.7 percent; and the nation's was 8.3 percent. 

The graduating class of Grant-Union Junior-Senior High School in John Day last spring was 37, down from 74 in 2010. Grant County's overall population fell 6.2 percent over the past decade. 

The loss of 70 sawmill jobs would be only the beginning of economic devastation for the area, said Thaddeus Thompson, operations manager for Chester's Thriftway in John Day, the county's biggest food store. He was braced for a 10 percent drop in food sales as residents left. 

Other retail outlets, including tire and hardware stores, expected to be equally hard-hit. Grant County Sheriff Glenn Palmer predicted an upsurge in poaching, illegal marijuana growing and firewood cutting on the national forest. 

"People are trying to make ends meet," he said. "We're already seeing people coming into town without firewood permits on their wood." 

Russ Hoeflich, Oregon director for The Nature Conservancy, credited U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden for bringing the parties together to rescue the mill, including the governor, U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley, U.S. Rep. Greg Walden, Forest Service's leaders, the Blue Mountain Partners and Grant County commissioners. 

"He found a solution that can meet the needs of Malheur Lumber, the John Day community, and in the process significantly advances the conservation needs of the Malheur National Forest," Hoeflich said. 

-- Richard Cockle

Friday, March 25, 2011

Changing forest trends create some unusual partnerships

The lumber company stalwart and the firebrand environmentalist had nothing in common ... until they discovered they both cared for trees


John Shelk

Related Documents


Posted: Friday, March 25, 2011 12:09 pm | Updated: 12:41 pm, Fri Mar 25, 2011.
JOHN DAY — Longtime Oregon lumberman John Shelk remembers the first time a colleague suggested that if he was interested in the idea of collaboration, he might want to talk to Andy Kerr.

“My first reaction was, ‘Oh, really ... there aren’t enough hours in the day,’” recalled Shelk, the managing director of Ochoco Lumber.

Wade Mosby, a Collins Pine Co. executive, had suggested the conversation because of Kerr’s involvement in Lakeview’s Federal Sustained Yield Unit, home to one of the longest running and most productive collaborative efforts in the state.

Kerr was better known, however, as a firebrand environmentalist with a knack for making headlines and leaving the old industry guard spitting mad.

Mosby also had been telling Kerr to talk to Shelk – and getting an equally skeptical response.

“We knew of each other, and we had low opinions of each other,” Kerr recalled. “We came from opposite sides of the timber war.”

 Eventually, Kerr met with Shelk at his office in Prineville. A tentative discussion led to a couple of trips into the woods. One was to the Malheur National Forest, where Tim Lillebo of Oregon Wild and Mike Billman of the Ochoco subsidiary, Malheur Lumber, had already been promoting collaboration.
“We realized that the world had changed, and we had a lot more in common than we thought,” said Kerr.

Partnership helped foster legislation

The unlikely alliance between the two men fostered perhaps the most high-profile legislative effort to date to bolster active management in the federal forests. The Oregon Eastside Forest Restoration, Old Growth Protection and Jobs Act was unveiled in December 2009 by U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden, flanked by a coterie of environmental and industry representatives – including Shelk and Kerr.

The bold plan was to require the U.S. Forest Service to identify and develop landscape-scale projects – at least 25,000 acres – on the federal forests in Eastern Oregon, with an aim of supplying timber for local mills, improving over-dense forest stands and retaining or creating jobs.

Despite an 11th-hour push, the bill stalled out last December as the Senate minority blocked virtually all attempts to pass public lands bills before the end of the session. Wyden hasn’t given up, however. On Jan. 27, he reintroduced the proposal, with revisions, as Senate Bill 220.

Whatever happens in the new session, proponents say the proposal has focused a national spotlight on the plight of the fire- and disease-prone forests of Eastern Oregon. It also reflected an evolving approach to forest management – one that puts former foes like Shelk and Kerr at the same table in an attempt to shortstop the litigation that has shut down logging on the eastside forests over the past two decades.

Wyden says the eastside alliance arose out of a mutual recognition by forest stakeholders – many of them former adversaries – that the forests and the communities amidst them are in crisis.

“We saw that there’s this window of time,” he said in a recent interview, “and it’s going to close in a hurry. The mills are going to close, the fires are going to burn down the forests.”

Wyden said it’s no surprise that the citizens who gathered to hash out the Eastside Forests bill include “principled and pragmatic folks” from both camps. They saw dwindling options.

“If we lose the mills, we won’t have jobs for the communities, and we won’t have that infrastructure that’s so necessary for environmental restoration,” he said.

Observers say the press conference helped to plant the seeds of that message in an important arena – the halls of Congress.

For Kerr and Shelk, the journey began with some trips into the woods to kick the duff and talk about trees.

“The idea was to see if we could find any common points of interest, beyond thinking the other is an SOB,” Shelk said. Despite a tension headache or two, the meetings generated some agreement – and the tantalizing idea that the group should work on legislation for a compromise over the forests of Oregon.

The discussions proceeded with a hand-picked group of environmentalists and industry people – seven from each side. Shelk said that by seeking out moderates, “it took out the bomb-throwers on either end of the spectrum.”

The “7x7” group still represented an array of views – from the Oregon Wild to Roseburg Lumber, from Pacific Rivers Council to the American Forest Resources Council. Shelk remembers the first meeting for its classic body language: “Everybody was armed for battle.”

Participants knew that the forests were overgrown, and that fires and insects were destroying thousands of acres of trees. Yet they were wary of each other’s motives for still-polarized stands on active management. Shelk recalls it went something like: “You’re blocking any sort of activity in the forest” vs. “You just want to cut down more big trees.”

Throughout, the participants tested each other on specific scenarios.

“Let’s say a 36-inch tree blows over and has to be removed. What do you do with it? They wanted to cut it but leave it in a stream or on the ground for habitat,” Shelk recalled. “My answer was, how about if I could take that tree to a mill and generate positive revenue, enough revenue to pay for thinning five acres of overgrown land?”

As the talks continued, the group narrowed its focus to the dry eastside pine forests where they had more in common.

At the time, Wyden had some discussion drafts of forest legislation that neither side liked. Instead, the group proposed a new approach, and Wyden’s chief of staff agreed to work with them.

The result was the bill unveiled at the December 2009 press conference.

Critics attacked plan

However, in hearings in Oregon and Washington, D.C., the bill ran into criticism – some of the harshest from the territory it would affect.

Grant County Judge Mark Webb conceded that while the backers were well intentioned, he opposed the bill. He said it would significantly increase regulation without giving the Forest Service any new authority or funding to manage the land. Environmentalists would gain more rules on which to appeal or litigate forest projects, he said.

Opponents particularly disliked a proposal for a science panel – a group of experts who would vet the large projects. Webb said that would put the federal forest managers under the control of outsiders, likely academicians, and further erode local influence on decision-making.

Shelk understood the concerns but also defended the intense discussion and debate that went into the bill.

He said the idea was to be prepared if, or when, a project gets to court.

“We were looking at key questions: How will this be viewed by a judge? How do we create a forest  project that is bullet-proof?” he said. “We worried these subjects to death – from two separate ideological viewpoints. But we agreed that we were looking for ways to move biologically defensible projects forward – projects that would be practical, economically viable and defensible in court.”

Kerr also acknowledged that the bill had its detractors, but he said it had been adjusted to reflect concerns from both sides. Asked about the concerns voiced by some environmental groups, he said, “There are some organizations that are unhappy with the bill as it was introduced. There are some that will be unhappy with anything.”

Wyden also finds that people are often suspicious until they can see a strong law at work on the ground, but he sees hope for a solution in the future – if industry and conservation groups can work together.

“Keeping the forests healthy can translate into a healthy economy,” he said. “It’s good for the mills, it’s good for the ecosystems.”

Thursday, February 3, 2011

Governor Kitzhaber Speaks on Timber


Governor John Kitzhaber attended a meeting of The Oregon Committee, a coalition of Oregon businesses originally formed as a political committee, and now the Committee is focused on policy matters that impact businesses.  The Governor joined the meeting and spoke about the Budget he released yesterday, February 1.

Kitzhaber said he was going to “add-back” $6 million to restore the fire protection budget for a 50-50% split between forest landowners and the General Fund and to fund enforcement of the Forest Practices Act.  The Governor also said he was interested in a “discussion” of Natural Resource Agency consolidation and plans to restore the Natural Resource Policy Advisor Office in the Governor’s Office.  He is still two weeks away from announcing his selection for someone to head up his Natural Resource Office.

Jim Geisinger, Associated Oregon Loggers Executive Vice President, commented on the Governor’s transition team’s biomass recommendations.  Geisinger noted that the federal government owns nearly 60% of the forests in Oregon; and it is essential for the federal agencies to produce timber for sawmills, plywood mills and loggers in order to maintain the necessary infrastructure in Oregon’s rural communities if the biomass industry is to evolve as an economic force.  

Utilization of biomass is dependent on a viable logging and milling industry, Geisinger said.  Biomass for renewable energy can only be economically viable if it is tied to vibrant traditional industry infrastructure of sawmills and plywood plants.

The Governor responded by mentioning his “not very successful” Eastside forest planning effort.  Kitzhaber was encouraged by Sen. Ron Wyden’s effort to craft federal legislation to address the significant forest health issue in Eastern Oregon and he mentioned the collaborative efforts ongoing in southwest Oregon as a possible success story.

Governor Kitzhaber noted that times must have changed since John Shelk and Andy Kerr were now collaborating.  He said, “there must have been progress” or maybe it was a miracle…or as Geisinger noted “an act of desperation.”