Photo by Ellen Miller
Showing posts with label DeFazio. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DeFazio. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Rough & Ready Lumber, Josephine County's last sawmill, a casualty of southwest Oregon's enduring timber wars

Rough & Ready Lumber, Josephine County's last sawmill, a casualty of southwest Oregon's enduring timber wars

(Gallery by The Associated Press)
Scott Learn, The OregonianBy Scott Learn, The Oregonian 
Email the author | Follow on Twitter
on May 20, 2013 at 5:06 PM, updated May 21, 2013 at 12:29 PM
Email
CAVE JUNCTION – Here lies Rough & Ready Lumber. The last sawmill in Josephine County closes next week, a grim milestone in the persistent stalemate over logging that's peculiar to this unique corner of Oregon.

In much of western Oregon, the 1990s timber wars have given way to a shaky détente, with a focus on thinning and light-touch restoration in federal forests.
In southwest Oregon, the battle still runs hot.

High unemployment raises the stakes here. So does a storied timber history and a heavy reliance on dwindling logging revenues from federal forests to fund county government. 

Three Oregon Congressmen want to more than double logging in the region's O&C Lands, forests shifted to the feds after an early 20th Century railroad deal went sour.

But the consequences are uniquely high for environmentalists, too, who said no to big increases in logging when Gov. John Kitzhaber convened an O&C Lands task force last year to attempt a compromise.

Josephine County and its neighbors sit in the Klamath-Siskiyou eco-region, one of the most biologically diverse places on the planet. The landscape, warmer than Douglas fir strongholds to the north, supports 36 species of conifers alone and some of Oregon's top runs of salmon and steelhead.

Meanwhile, Josephine County voters decide today whether to increase their lowest-in-the-state property taxes to partially plug the gap left by logging reductions.

"Everybody views this as black and white, and it's just not that way," says Tom Tuchman, Kitzhaber's forestry adviser. "Finding a balance is an incredibly difficult thing to do."

Mill moments

Jennifer Phillippi's grandfather opened Rough & Ready 90 years ago, a safe bet in a county that's two-thirds federal forests. At the mill, the snowcapped Siskiyou Mountains hang on the horizon, and the smell of sawdust still lingers.

But the mill stopped sawing last month, with Phillippi and her husband, Link, citing a lack of reliable log supply from public lands.

Federal timber production and jobs at Oregon mills have fallen dramatically since 1990, when the northern spotted owl was listed under the Endangered Species Act

Bigger, more efficient mills and the huge housing construction drop in the recent recession contributed as well.

Rough & Ready was among 22 sawmills in Josephine and Jackson counties in 1975, the Phillippis said, down to none now.

The mill was small, running one shift with 85 jobs. And the recession stung. But the problem wasn't demand, said Jennifer Phillippi, one of three co-owners.
GS.31TIMB2-02.jpgView full size
"We have customers who are dying for it," she said. "The only thing we don't have is the logs."

In 2002, Rough & Ready shut down its small-log mill running three shifts. It needed millions in investment to compete in commodity timber, said Link Phillippi, the mill's president. 

Nearby lumber, needed to keep costs low, wasn't steady enough, he said.

Instead, they upgraded a large-log mill and built a niche in appearance-grade lumber for exposed beams and high-quality windows and doors.

For that, they needed the clear, knot-free pine and fir that runs toward the outside of larger logs. The ideal: 80- to 100-year-old second-growth logs -- not old growth, the Phillippis stress -- 22 to 24 inches wide.

The mill put out "one of the best products in the sawmill business," says John Dunkin president of Rogue Valley Door, one of the largest U.S. manufacturers. These days, his company buys wood from Canada.

Forest politics 

The Phillippis say environmental groups helped stifle timber sales, protesting five of the last six U.S. Bureau of Land Management sales with Rough & Ready as the winning bidder. BLM handles most of the O&C Lands.

An industry group protested the sixth sale for lack of log supply, but withdrew it after Rough & Ready won the bid. BLM also removed two large sales in 2006 after protests, Link Phillippi said.

"Rarely do we buy a federal timber sale that we can operate right away. It usually takes a year or two. Sometimes they get eliminated."

Oregon Timber
JOBS
1990: 63,700
2010: 25,300
SAWMILLS
1988: 165
2008: 116
2012: 69
O&C LANDS
Annual growth: 1.2 billion board feet
Industry favored cut: 500 million
Current cut: less than 200 million
SOURCES: U.S. Forest Service; Oregon Forest Resources Institute; Bureau of Land Management.
Oregon Democratic Reps. Peter DeFazio and Kurt Schrader, and Republican Greg Walden are pitching a deal in the U.S. House to more than double logging on O&C land.

Their proposal, supported by industry, would put 1.5 million acres of previously logged forests in a trust run for timber production and managed under more lenient state laws for private forests -- a shift designed to limit environmental appeals.

The U.S. Forest Service would manage the remaining 1.1 million acres with a focus on retaining old growth. The Rogue Wilderness would get 56,000 more acres.

The plan could fly in the Republican-controlled House. It stands little chance in the Democrat-controlled Senate, Oregon Sen.Ron Wyden has warned.

DeFazio's approach is the "only hope for federal timber in our region," Link Phillippi said. But after decades of battling, the Phillippis said, the prospects are too dim for Rough & Ready to bank on.
Biggest and best
Eighteen miles down the Redwood Highway from the mill, Walter and Mary Camp manage their own 180 acres of forest with light-touch logging to improve forest health. Threatened coastal coho salmon teem in their pond.

DeFazio's proposal, which would apply Oregon's private logging rules to public forests, scares them, the Camps said.

Their property is surrounded by a mix of private and O&C forests, typical in southwest Oregon.

In 2008, Rough & Ready's timberland arm clear-cut 67 acres next door to the Camps, spraying herbicides afterward. That approach is allowed under Oregon's Forest Practices Act, and would extend to lands placed in the trust, the Camps fear.

The proposal "should terrify people across the nation," Mary Camp said.
Endangered Species Act rules on the trust lands would also be far less stringent. Many cuts would be in potential spotted owl habitat. And streamside protection would drop from putting nearly 40 percent of harvestable acres off limits to about 5 percent.

GS.31TIMB121-02.jpgView full size
In cooler, wetter northwest Oregon, BLM has focused on thinning projects. That tends to go over well in thick, second-growth Douglas fir stands clear-cut and replanted decades ago. Mills set up for small logs can process them into commodity lumber and other products.

Thinning is tougher to execute profitably and ecologically in southwest Oregon. Ecologists here focus on keeping larger pines and clearing smaller trees crowding them.

That's the rub for Rough & Ready: Larger trees like its mill needs, particularly pines, aren't left to grow on private lands, where more profitable 30- to 60-year rotations are the norm.
The Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center has led many timber sale appeals.

George Sexton, the group's conservation director, says he offered to back off a lawsuit over a recent Rough & Ready sale, Rio Rumble, if BLM put trees less than 30 inches wide off limits.

The agency declined, saying older trees needed to be cut to prevent harmful mistletoe spread along the trees' crowns.

Rough & Ready and at least seven Oregon mills are relying on larger diameter trees from public lands, environmental groups estimate.

Rough & Ready's mistake was banking on bigger trees, particularly large pines, said Steve Pedery, Oregon Wild's conservation director. New regulations have cut harvests because past volumes were unsustainable, he said, harming streams, salmon and wildlife.

"It's not a good business model to depend on eliminating 20 years of conservation standards."

300 million feet apart
The governor hoped his O&C committee would compromise. It didn't.
The environmental representatives could swallow just over 200 million board feet a year, tapping an "ecological forestry" model with limited clear-cuts. Industry and county representatives stuck to 500 million, enough to meet county revenue goals.

staff report said meeting the revenue goals and abiding by environmental laws as interpreted now "appear to be mutually exclusive." It also said thinning projects would run out in 10 to 25 years.

Wyden has promised a strategy later this month to address the deadlock. The two sides could reconcile in conference committee.

The House proposal could use more streamside protection, DeFazio agreed. But it would pay for private forest streamside buffers, manage half the trust lands in at least 100-year rotations and add wilderness and some old-growth protections.

Industry has filed lawsuits for bigger cuts, arguing that O&C law sets aside the lands for "sustainable yield."

If the lawsuits succeed, "the environmentalists would be here in a second saying, 'We want old-growth protection and wilderness,'" DeFazio said. "At that point, I might not be able to get it."

Back at Rough & Ready, 19-year millwright Larry Mason is hoping for a solution. Josephine County's unemployment rate tops 11 percent. At last count, a quarter of its residents were on food stamps. Mason figures his chances of getting a local job are close to zero.
It could make you cry every night, Mason said.

"In this valley, there's no jobs. The kids my daughter went to school with, none of them have jobs. It's tough, man."

-- Scott Learn

Monday, January 3, 2011

Treat the Forests---Save our Communities


Treat the Forests---Save our Communities by Tom Partin, American Forest Resource Council
There is a new momentum building across the West that is taking many forms, but has a common theme: ---“Treat the Forests and Save our Communities.”  The impetus is coming from rural Americans who have been played like pawns in a chess game over how the federal forests surrounding their communities are being managed.  The uprising gets stronger with every acre of federal forest that goes up in flames destroying homes and watersheds, or is killed by insects and disease. It is also strengthened by the closure of each sawmill, by every rural community that faces 20 percent unemployment, and by every local government unable to meet the needs of its citizenry.  The beat is signaling that the West has had enough of watching both our forests and rural communities die a slow and unnecessary death.  It is also an indication that rural America has had enough of special interest groups that use the court system and taxpayer dollars gleaned through the Equal Access to Justice Provision to stifle needed projects while forests and communities suffer!  

A new social license is rapidly evolving as the need to reestablish management and create jobs in our federal forests is becoming clear.  In Oregon we have seen this demand for change being carried by Senator Ron Wyden’s efforts to increase forest management east of the Cascades, by Peter DeFazio who brought Interior Secretary Ken Salazar to Oregon to seek a solution for the BLM lands in southwest Oregon, and by Congressman Greg Walden who has introduced legislation to expand the authorities of the Healthy Forest Restoration Act to treat more forested acres.

In Montana Senator Jon Tester introduced the Montana Forest Jobs and Restoration Initiative; Senators Risch of Idaho and Udall of Colorado introduced the National Forest Insect and Disease Emergency Act for use in any area where insect epidemics pose a threat to forest health and human safety. Other national forests such as the Colville in Washington and the Nez Perce in Idaho sent delegations back to Washington DC asking for expanded authorization to get more acres of forest health treatments on the landscape. In California the collaborative Quincy Library Group has worked to restore management of some forests in the Sierra Nevada.  The voices are many and strong.  At a recent meeting with Interior Secretary Salazar in Washington, DC, we heard Oregon’s Congressional delegation declare that if an administrative solution to the federal management gridlock is not found, a legislative solution will be forthcoming. 

Each of these efforts, while specific to individual regions or forests have surfaced out of desperation of the people who live in rural America and want to forge new workable solutions for our federal forests.  While each bill or request may vary, they have the same theme: ---“Treat the Forests and Save our Communities.”

Congress must now listen to the drumbeat from rural America and take action to get needed forest heath treatments implemented; put our residents in rural America back to work; and reject the actions of those who hold jobs and communities hostage by using lawsuits to stop sound forest management projects.   

The rural West has experienced 20 years of ineffectual federal forest management and has paid the price by living in increasing poverty and watching their forests decline and die.  The tide has turned and a new momentum has developed for action.  It’s about time! 


Sunday, January 2, 2011

On forest issues, Oregon must break free

The Oregonian Editorial Board By The Oregonian Editorial Board 


To get their economy flowing again, Oregonians must carve a fresh path around the barriers that have blocked productive management of public lands 

One sunny day last August, the Rogue River lost patience with the pace of progress in removing Gold Ray Dam. The river suddenly surged through a sand bar, stranded frightened workers atop the remnants of the old dam and blasted a new channel, opening 157 miles of river for migrating fish. 


rogueriver.JPG
That marked one of the great moments in the Oregon outdoors last year. An antiquated barrier collapsed, a bitter, decades-long debate ended and, the Rogue, one of the state's great natural resources, ran wild all the way to the sea. 

Gold Ray's removal was a significant event not only because a dam fell, but because it showed that Oregonians can come together and break through difficult, contentious debates over natural resources. 

It's that spirit, that collaboration, that Oregonians must summon this year to finally push through the barriers that have blocked progress on the management of public forests and rivers. 

Like the Rogue, Oregonians should follow promising paths wherever they lead. Here's one: Conservationists and timber industry executives have signed on to an eastside forest compromise brokered by U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden. The deal protects old-growth trees while freeing up tens of thousands of acres of sick, overstocked, fire-prone forests for logging. The plan would save forests, jobs and the last few mills east of the Cascades in Oregon. By year's end, it ought to be law. 

Here's another path: Rep. Peter DeFazio recently met with Interior Secretary Ken Salazar to urge a plan from widely respected foresters Jerry Franklin and Norm Johnson to increase logging and improve forest health on Bureau of Land Management forests in southwestern Oregon. By year's end, these large test projects ought to be under way, too. 

There's more common ground out there, if Oregonians, elected officials and interest groups are willing to stray from their hard lines. For instance, conservation groups seek to expand the protected wilderness around the Rogue River. The timber industry doesn't object. 

Clearly, these areas will never be logged. Again, let's get it done. By year's end, Congress should approve the new Rogue wilderness. 

There's broad agreement, too, in the Klamath Basin, where Oregonians have fought for decades over water. The Klamath Basin Resource Agreement worked out last year would sweep most of these differences away, guaranteeing reliable irrigation water and removing four fish-killing dams. It's a bold new path to more predictable conditions for more Klamath farmers, healthier fish runs and more stable fishing seasons for coastal fishermen. By year's end, this vital compromise must still be on track. 

Wherever you live, you need to care about how and when these issues on Oregon's vast public forest and rivers are resolved. Every one affects the delicate balance between economy and environment. Every one affects the future of the state. 

Oregon is not going to flourish with rural unemployment pushing 20 percent and counties struggling to maintain the most basic services, including public safety. It can't get stronger with families moving away from rural communities and their schools. 

It can't build a strong economy or a healthy environment around public forests that get ever more crowded and vulnerable to disease and wildfire. It can't strengthen its coastal economy if commercial salmon fishing is shut down every other year. 

These issues are barriers standing between Oregon and better days. They're blocking our progress. It's time to take those new paths, and break free.