Photo by Ellen Miller
Showing posts with label Allyn Ford. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Allyn Ford. Show all posts

Thursday, February 7, 2013

Kitzhaber panel fails to reach consensus on O&C lands logging


Kitzhaber panel fails to reach consensus on O&C lands logging


The Oregonian
By The Oregonian 
on February 07, 2013 at 6:00 AM, updated February 07, 2013 at 6:10 AM
Email
LogTruckSWOr.jpgView full size 
After three months of work, Gov.John Kitzhaber's panel of timber executives, environmentalists and leaders from Oregon's most financially strapped counties couldn't agree on how to solve the logging tug-of-war over on 2.6 million acres of federal forestland in Western Oregon.

But the 14-member panel has teed up Congress to forge a compromise by drawing on options the committee explored, Kitzhaber said Wednesday. He's recommending it remain in place to advise Oregon's Congressional delegation.

The panel has "changed the tone of the debate," Kitzhaber said, adding that he's "very, very optimistic" a solution will be found.

"We prepared a menu," the governor said. "Now they have to take it back to D.C. and prepare a meal."

The Oregon & California Railroad timberlands, mostly owned by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, are crucial for the state. Logging there provide jobs and federal payments to 18 rural counties and that money has dropped with logging declines, leaving some southwest Oregon counties struggling to provide basic services.

The lands, mixed into a checkerboard of private parcels, also provide critical habitat for fish and wildlife, including salmon and the northern spotted owl, listed as threatened in 1990.

The group's failure to reach consensus is a rare stumble for Kitzhaber, who said heexpected the panel to craft a proposal when he launched it last October. He also said that would be a tall order; the problem has confounded policy makers for decades.

The panel deadlocked on some key points, including the amount of logging and the degree of streamside protection. In a letter to Oregon's delegation, Kitzhaber declined to endorse a specific approach.

"I didn't throw in a specific proposal because ultimately this is going to be negotiated with a whole host of interests back in D.C.," he said.

Kitzhaber added a sweetener, pledging $10 million a year for 10 years toward voluntary private land conservation if a deal is reached.

County and timber representatives on the panel favored plans that would increase logging to more than 500 million board feet a year. They would generate more than $100 million dollars in annual county revenues, up from $13 million now.

Oregon Reps. Peter DeFazioKurt Schrader and Greg Walden have pitched one such plan. They proposed converting 1.5 million acres to a "public trust" managed for commercial logging purposes.
OCMap.jpgView full size 
Environmental groups say that approach would run afoul of federal environmental laws, including the Endangered Species Act, and cut into hundreds of thousands of acres of federally designated critical habitat.Conservation representatives on the panel favored sticking closer to the current 200 million board feet a year, though they agreed to "regeneration harvests" with limited clearcuts. O&C logging is largely thinning projects now.

Those proposals would generate up to $36 million a year for counties, who don't collect property taxes from federal lands.

U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., chairman of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, has raised concerns about the political viability of DeFazio's proposal, and says he wants forest management "to comply with all federal laws."

Allyn Ford, a panel member and president of Roseburg Forest Products, said the governor helped build a better working relationship between all the parties. That's unique, he said, and should help going forward. "A grand consensus would have been wonderful," Ford said, "but the issue was really trying to get the facts on the table."

The governor's staff prepared a 94-page report that summarizes findings, including modeling runs for different logging scenarios. The panel also considered selling some federal land, perhaps 200,000 acres, to private logging companies to raise more money.

John Kober, a panel member and executive director of the Pacific Rivers Council, said there isn't enough land reasonably available for logging to solve the counties' financial plight.
Conservation members noted that property tax rates are low in the O&C counties and that Oregon's timber taxes are low among Western states.

"We can't solve it with timber alone," Kober said. "It's got to be a shared responsibility."
Statements from Wyden and DeFazio's offices did not address the odds of finding a solution or the timing of Congressional action.

Any solution likely won't come in time to help timber-reliant counties with their 2013-14 budgets. Douglas County Commissioner Doug Robertson, a panel member and president of the Association of O&C Counties, said counties will once again press for federal bridge funding.
About a third of Douglas County's $30 million general fund comes from county timber payments, Robertson said, down from two-thirds historically.

"We're eliminating positions and services and trying to identify priorities, mainly law enforcement," Robertson said. "It's not going to be pretty, I can tell you that."

Charles Pope of The Oregonian contributed to this report.
-- Scott Learn and Yuxing Zheng.

Governor Kitzhaber Calls for Congressional Action on O&C Lands

Governor Kitzhaber Calls for Congressional Action on O&C Lands


NEWS RELEASE

FEBRUARY 7, 2013

Media Contact:
Tim Raphael, 503-689-6117
Amy Wojcicki, 503-689-5324


Governor Kitzhaber Calls for Congressional Action on O&C Lands  

 
(Salem, OR) —  Governor Kitzhaber today called for Congressional action to improve the financial stability of Oregon counties, ensure adequate sources of timber to support mills and jobs and meet conservation goals for land and water protection. In a letter to Oregon’s Congressional Delegation, Governor Kitzhaber reported on the work of his O&C Lands Panel and outlined components of a solution for hard-hit counties.

The Governor brought together a diverse group of 14 county officials, forest product industry representatives and conservation leaders that spent three months developing a series of forest management options. The panel seeks to continue its work with the Oregon delegation to resolve the longstanding O&C issue.

“I applaud the panel for establishing a foundation of understanding and trust between county officials, forest product industry representatives and conservation leaders that has eluded O&C discussions for decades,” said Governor Kitzhaber. “I believe a solution can and should be passed into law that achieves significant economic and environmental benefits for Oregonians.”

The O&C Lands Panel analyzed a range of land management options utilizing timber supply and projections modeling as well as ecological effects modeling. The results propose creative new ways to optimize public values tied to O&C land management.

In his letter to the Oregon delegation, Governor Kitzhaber highlighted several important components of an O&C solution that are supported by the analysis:

  • Stable and predictable timber sale levels above current harvest levels can be achieved with minimal impact to old-growth and aquatic ecosystems;
  • Timber harvest and/or land disposition revenues can significantly improve the financial stability of O&C counties;
  • There are approximately 150,000 acres of special places deserving of Wilderness designation or some other form of legislative protection. Additional acres should be considered for Wild and Scenic River designation;
  • Voluntary, non-regulatory private land conservation strategies can play an important role in advancing conservation values, timber supply and fire management; and
  • The O&C Act should be amended to create more certainty in producing environmental and economic outcomes.
Oregon and California (O&C) lands are unique to Oregon. The 2.6 million acres of forests across 18 counties are a compilation of land ownerships resulting from various Congressional actions dating to the Oregon and California Railroad Act of 1866. For more detail:

Link to O&C Lands Report:
http://oregon.gov/gov/GNRO/docs/OCLandsReport.pdf

Link to Governor’s letter:
http://www.oregon.gov/gov/GNRO/docs/OCDelegationLetter.pdf

Link to Panel Perspectives:
http://www.oregon.gov/gov/GNRO/docs/OCPanelPerspectives.pdf


 
###

Monday, May 28, 2012

Timber Country -- seeing beyond the trees


Timber Country -- seeing beyond the trees

Sixty-seven years ago, when Allyn Ford's father opened his first sawmill in Roseburg, he found a straightforward way to make money: A grinding, steel maw chewed through locally cut trees, spitting out millions of board feet of lumber annually.
Those days are long gone. Today, trees from nearby state and federal forests are nearly as scarce as spotted owls.
Nine states
The "Nine states of Oregon" project was originally published in The Oregonian in November 2003.Editors have republished the complete series in response to readers' requests.
Now, Ford's family-owned Roseburg Forest Products is betting its future on high-tech home-building materials and tight relationships with customers. Trouble is, Ford's competitors in South America, Canada and Asia are all vying for the same markets.
"We'd better be good," says Ford, an affable man with a Stanford University M.B.A. who admits to healthy revenues but elusive earnings. "We're competing with everyone in the world."
Similar stories echo through Timber Country, which stretches along the western face of the Cascades, curls west around Eugene and brushes the Coast Range. Survival of the fittest applies equally to the flora and fauna of the Elliott State Forest's mist-filled hills and the struggling mill towns of Oakridge, Mill City and Sweet Home.
Most of the trees in Timber Country belong to the federal government. During the past decade, in response to environmental regulations and lawsuits, the feds have drastically scaled back logging, dragging down harvests to record lows in 2001. Since 1989, about 160 mills statewide have closed, taking with them 35,000 jobs.
While regions such as Southern Oregon, Central Oregon and the Columbia Corridor have rallied around new industries, new residents and new identities, Timber Country has struggled, with limited success, to right itself.
The bigger towns, especially those along Interstate 5, are slowly diversifying. But they're still counting on timber companies to fortify the region. Many smaller towns, which lost their livelihoods along with the logs, are trying to turn to tourists, commuters and retirees.
The industry that once ruled Oregon's economy, politics and identity watched as Portland's 1990s boom made high-tech king. It was a financial and psychological blow that has deepened tensions in the region and made the politics of Timber Country increasingly conservative, defensive and angry.
At best, the mood in these blue-collar towns is skittish.
"Everyone's feeling insecure," says Randy Fouts, who drove a forklift for Roseburg Forest Products for 30 years before becoming a business agent for Lumber and Sawmill Workers Local 2949. "They don't know what the future holds."
Gap in wages doubles
Despite the industry's decline, Oregon remains the largest softwood producer in the country.
Wood products workers account for 15 percent of the state's manufacturing employment, compared with 20 percent in high-tech. Timber companies and their executives contribute heavily to political campaigns and maintain a powerful lobby in Salem and Washington, D.C.
The industry's resilience has forced state leaders to question economic development policies that have favored high-tech over timber. Gov. Ted Kulongoski, for instance, has signed legislation making it easier to redevelop abandoned mill sites.
And it has kept the pressure on lawmakers to balance environmental, recreational and logging interests. Last legislative session, the industry pushed a bill to increase logging on some state forests, but it died after heated debate.
Still, with most of Timber Country's forests in federal hands, state influence is limited.
"I don't think Ted can do much good," Fouts says.
Amid the clash of interests, timber companies are finding ways to survive. Roseburg Forest Products bought up private timberland, branched into a wide array of lumber products and modernized operations.
Instead of selling off its mills, as others have done, it has been investing in new ones. The latest is a highly automated $75 million building products plant. Unlike its forerunners, which turned big logs into millions of two-by-fours, the plant assembles composite materials into sturdy, easy-to-use joists, beams and columns for homes and other structures.
The operation sprawls across 70 acres. A single building encloses 11 acres and contains such proprietary equipment that managers won't talk about details.
"We've decided to go big and fast," says Ford, who continues to pump millions of dollars into capital improvements.
With annual sales of about $800 million and a work force of about 3,000, Roseburg Forest Products is one of the state's largest privately held companies. For decades, it has been Roseburg's biggest employer.
Even so, the company hasn't turned a profit in the past two years. And this summer, it announced layoffs in its plywood unit, including the closure of a plant in Green on the outskirts of Roseburg.
The layoffs will leave more than 600 people -- 20 percent of the work force -- without jobs. They shocked a community still raw from a decade-long slump.
"It wasn't a pleasant decision," Ford says. "We're part of the community, and we feel it."
Judy Sherman, 60, a short, strong-looking woman with graying hair and rugged hands, learned of the layoffs -- including hers -- while buying bread in a downtown bakery.
"All kinds of things ran through my mind -- what bills hadn't I paid, how long would the money last," says Sherman, who had worked for timber companies for 30 years, the last eight in one of Roseburg Forest Products' plywood mills.
Sherman, who is single and cares for two young children and a grown grandson and granddaughter, can't afford to retire. She also doesn't expect to get her old job back. "Everything is so downsized and mechanized," she says. "We knew it was just a matter of time before our jobs were gone for good."
Other jobs, such as those with Dell Computer's new call center in Roseburg, have helped offset declines in timber employment. But service-oriented jobs generally are lower-paying and can be ill-suited to mill workers' skills.
From 1990 to 2000, the gap between the county's average wage and Oregon's more than doubled to $3,688. The divide between county and national average wages: $7,604.
Sherman hopes to go back to school, using money from a federal aid program for dislocated workers, to earn a degree in early childhood education.
She says she should have changed her career years ago. Even so, she doesn't understand why federal policies have come down so hard on harvest levels.
"There's no reason or rhyme why they can't harvest and replant and harvest," she says.
Looking for income, federal help
When Paul Ehinger, 80, worked for Edward Hines Lumber in Westfir, the company ran a sawmill, a plywood mill and a logging operation, dominating the bustling town east of Eugene.
Today, the company's office is a bed-and-breakfast.
Runaway costs shut down Westfir's timber operation by the early 1980s. The town where Ehinger raised his family has dwindled to 307 people and three businesses: the bed-and-breakfast, a U.S. post office and a massage therapist.
The most vulnerable mills lay in small towns like Westfir -- next to, or within, federal forests and heavily dependent on publicly owned trees. Boring, Estacada, Lyons, Idanha, Sweet Home, Oakridge, Dillard, Drain, Creswell, all suffered mill closures. Like Westfir, many have found little to fill the void.
"The ones in the center of government forests have pretty much disappeared over the horizon," says Ehinger, now a private timber consultant in Eugene.
State employment economists say almost half of the timber workers who lost their jobs in the 1990s fell off employment rolls for good. They moved to other states or retired or became part of "a cadre of chronically underemployed rural residents," labor expert Art Ayre wrote in a June article in the Journal of Forestry.
When harvests in Oregon peaked in 1986 at 8.7 billion board feet, 56 percent of the logs came from federal lands. At the low in 2001, the share had plummeted to 5 percent.
The hardships have laced communities with bitterness and a sense of betrayal. Politics are more polarized and conservative, Ehinger and others say.
"We're Republican-based but labor-friendly. That's a tough mix," says Fouts, the union leader. "Add environmental issues, and that's really a problem."
Many blame the federal government for shoddy forest management. They blame environmentalists for extremist tactics in the courts and in the forests. They blame Portland for forgetting its roots and fostering liberal attitudes unsympathetic to Timber Country's problems.
"I'm not saying they're ignorant. They just don't understand," Fouts says.
Republican state Rep. Susan Morgan has lived for 25 years in Myrtle Creek, a onetime timber town south of Roseburg. She's looking to Congress to increase federal timber harvests -- not to the levels of the past, but substantially above those of today.
The forest fires that have raged through the West in recent years have fueled the Bush administration's efforts to thin more trees and increase harvests. After Bush visited Oregon this summer to promote his cause, Timber Country residents began talking more optimistically about federal policies easing.
"There's hope here that we can regain some of the losses," Morgan says. "There has to be some kind of rational approach to managing the federal forests."
Counties also are lobbying for the continuation of their timber subsidies, put in place in 2001 and due to expire in 2006.
Yet analyst Ehinger remains cautious. "Honestly," he says, "I don't see the environmental movement turning over and playing dead in the sand."
Timber Country tries to diversify
Like many towns, Oakridge isn't banking on timber's return.
In the mid-1990s, the city bought the abandoned Bald Knob sawmill at the edge of town, eager to tear it down and forget about the past.
But the community, which lies in the lush Willamette National Forest southeast of Eugene, hasn't been able to lure a new manufacturing tenant to the site. So the mill gathers rust, its pale green sides ripped and ragged, its rafters dripping rain.
"The pigeons rent it," says Jay Bennett, a former city administrator.
Government money helped Oakridge buy the 220-acre site, which the town plans to turn into a campuslike industrial park. Some of the work is done, and a few small businesses have moved in.
Bryan Huber, chief executive of Creative Composites, came to Oakridge to build high-end snowboards, but he ended up manufacturing aircraft parts for the U.S. Air Force, a more lucrative niche. With annual sales approaching $1 million and employment growing, he plans to expand the business into an available building at the industrial park.
Huber is a sailor, as well as a snowboarder and businessman. He says Oakridge, resting in a tight valley pocket within the forest, is the perfect spot to play and make money. Highway 58 brings travelers to nearby rivers, lakes and the Willamette Pass ski area.
Randy Dreiling, chamber of commerce president and owner of Oregon-adventures.com, is convinced the town can become a destination for mountain bikers, rivaling hot spots like Bend in Deschutes County.
Dreiling tried to get traction for his business back in the early 1990s. But the mill had recently closed, and laid-off timber workers were in no mood for the peddlings of forest-loving mountain bikers.
" 'Tree-hugger' was the politest thing they called us," Dreiling recalls.
Now, many of the timber families are gone. And the townspeople who remain seem more receptive to new ventures, Dreiling says. Early this year, he moved to Oakridge from Eugene, set up a Web site and began organizing mountain-bike tours.
With 500 miles of trails winding through the surrounding forests, "the atmosphere up here is great for biking," he says. "It's just a matter of time."
-- Gail Kinsey Hill

Sunday, May 6, 2012

The Great Recession’s Impact on Douglas County

The Great Recession’s Impact on Douglas County

NewsWatch 12 KDRV.com

By Brandi Smith

ROSEBURG, Ore. -- Spread over more than 5,000 acres, Douglas County encompasses the entire Umpqua River basin from Diamond Lake to Reedsport. Its economic history is as rich as the land its first settlers mined.

When the county was established in 1852, people came there looking for gold. But they found something else valuable in the soil: its ability to grow just about anything.

"Prunes grew well here. Nut crops grew well here," said UCC professor Chris Lake. "Kruse Farms had 700 acres of cauliflower a long time ago."

Over time, focus turned to another natural resource; lumber mills started popping up all over the valley. After World War II, things really started hopping.

"I think the best years were mid-50s to mid-60s," said Art Adams, owner of Nordic Veneer, Inc. "There were a lot of mills in the area then, but it was great."

Things steadied in the 1980s. The mills became a way of life for their workers, like 17-year Roseburg Forest Products employee Jeremy Wiest.

"I think it's probably the biggest thing we have in this county, the timber industry," he said. "It was in my family. My dad worked in the industry, worked for Roseburg Forest Products."
Mills are also a way of life for their owners, like Adams. His father owned Nordic when he started working there in 1966.
"It's been a big part of my life my entire life," he said. "This pretty much defines me."

The industry also came to define the county, which made a name for itself as the timber capital of the state, the country and the world. Nearly 8 percent of the people who work in Douglas County work in wood products manufacturing. Compare that to about 2 percent of Lane County or 3 percent of Coos County.

When the 1990s rolled in, the spotted owl and more logging restrictions on federal land did too. The climate was changing -- and for Douglas County, it was not changing for the better.

"We've lost a lot of capacity due to the curtailment of harvesting on government timber lands," said RFP president Allyn Ford. "We cannot manufacture products out of air. We need trees."

Just more than four years ago, the housing bubble burst. What had always been the county's greatest strength was now clearly its greatest weakness.

"In Douglas County, the recession was especially bad because it's still somewhat dependent on manufacturing, especially wood products," said Worksource regional economist Brian Rooney.

New home construction dropped by nearly 70 percent. There were 2 million housing starts in 2007, but in 2012, that number is closer to 600,000. When demand drops that drastically, layoffs are a given. RFP handed pink slips to about 20 percent of its workers.

"Doesn't matter whether you're somebody who pours concrete, if you're a framer, if you're somebody who's in the cabinetry business," said Ford. "You work up the supply chain and into the manufacturing side, it's been devastating."

"t affects every business in this community," said Debbie Fromdahl, Roseburg Chamber of Commerce president, "because those are the folks who are actually spending money in all those different venues."

Unemployment soared from 7.4 percent in 2007 up to 16.2 percent in 2009. Even today, it's nowhere close to those 2007 numbers.

"I've been in the industry for almost 45 years," said Ford, "I guess I have hash marks up and down my sleeve that indicate I've been through quite a few of them. This one -- there's no comparison."

Monday on KEZI 9 News at 6:30, we'll look at how Douglas County's timber industry is bouncing back from the Great Recession.

Friday, December 30, 2011

Applaud, support bipartisan forest plan


and Allyn C. Ford

We applaud the action of U.S. Reps. Greg Walden, Peter DeFazio and Kurt Schrader as they work to strike a much-needed balance in how our federal forests are managed — for those of us who live here.

It's hardly news that Oregon, particularly rural Oregon, is enduring crippling levels of unemployment, desperately needing jobs from our former economic base: natural resources. One key barometer of Oregon's economic condition is industrial electricity demand, and usage has dropped off severely because of wood products manufacturing decline and mills closing. But it's not just about running mills or selling kilowatts, which is why what our congressmen propose is heartening — a bipartisan plan to put Oregonians back to work in our own forests, in a sustainable way.

By setting aside the most sensitive areas under consideration for conservation and unlocking other areas for active management and harvest, the plan could provide what rural Oregonians — and local governments — need most right now: certainty. Today, there is no certainty for local communities that the federal government will continue providing the timber payments that currently fund even the most basic services — law enforcement, emergency response and other essential government functions most of us take for granted.

The congressmen's plan recognizes that as these federal payments dry up, the only sustainable solution for Oregon's natural resource dependent communities is to un-tether from the federal appropriations game and be allowed to meet their needs locally. Home-grown jobs and some certainty of locally generated revenue are crucial for the literal survival of many Oregon communities, which is an effort worth supporting.

We represent companies that have provided critical electric service for 100 years and a wood products company that has grown over a half century into one of the major innovators and suppliers of products internationally, while maintaining its roots here. Over the years, and by working together, we now have a partnership where Roseburg Forest Products generates most of its own electricity and even sells back to Pacific Power — sustainably. We know that Oregon can manage local resources and find creative ways to add value to our communities because we are doing it. We listened closely at the recent Oregon Business Leadership Summit and heard Governor Kitzhaber loud and clear when he said that we need a new and collaborative approach to forest management. OK, here you have it. We both see promise in Oregon's future and know that this kind of vision and plan can lead the way to realizing a sustainable forest-based industry with economic stability, jobs and support for critical public services.

To do that, though, these representatives of our great state need our full-throated support for seeking a path forward. We welcome other business, civic, natural resource and elected leaders to join us in moving this plan forward quickly to gain approval.

R. Patrick Reiten is president and CEO of Pacific Power. Allyn C. Ford is CEO of Roseburg Forest Products.

Saturday, September 24, 2011

$5 Million Endowed Chair for Oregon State University College of Forestry

From OSU
CORVALLIS, Ore. – A $5 million commitment from the head of Roseburg Forest Products and his wife has created an endowment for the College of Forestry dean’s position at Oregon State University.
Named in honor of the donors, the Cheryl Ramberg and Allyn C. Ford Deanship of Forestry will be held by Hal Salwasser.

“For more than a century, the College of Forestry has been at the forefront of OSU’s efforts to produce research and graduates that enhance the state of Oregon,” said OSU President Ed Ray. “Today it is considered among the best forestry programs in the world, and it is a critical part of the university’s focus on sustainable earth ecosystems and economic growth.

“This visionary gift from Allyn and Cheryl Ford illustrates that in tough economic times smart people redouble efforts to preserve the path to excellence,” Ray said. “Their investment assures that the college will have outstanding leadership for the next century and beyond.”

A member of the college’s board of visitors, Allyn Ford became president and CEO of Roseburg Forest Products in 1997. The company was founded by his father, Ken Ford, in 1936 and is now one of the largest family-held wood products corporations in the United States, and among the nation’s largest timberland owners.

“At Roseburg Forest Products we have seen very clearly how important the College of Forestry is for the future of our industry,” Ford said. “Faculty research and innovation help us stay competitive in the global marketplace. It’s also essential that the college continue to provide the industry with graduates who understand these complex systems. We need leaders who can offer sustainable solutions that support the future health of our state and our world.”

A native of southern Oregon and secretary for the Ramberg Glass Company board in Roseburg, Cheryl Ramberg-Ford is a University of Oregon Foundation trustee and former president of the UO Alumni Association. She serves on the boards of the Jordan Schnitzer Museum of Art and Wildlife Safari and is a member of the Tree of Hope Committee for Mercy Medical Center in Roseburg, Ore. Allyn Ford serves on the Oregon State Board of Higher Education, is a director of the Doernbecher Hospital Foundation and the World Forestry Center, and chairs the board of Umpqua Bank.

“This is a family that is profoundly committed to the state of Oregon and to higher education,” said Mike Goodwin, president and CEO of the OSU Foundation. “We are deeply grateful for the Fords’ support as OSU advances to the next level as a major international research university.”

The Ford family has a long history with Oregon State University.

Allyn’s sister, Carmen Ford Phillips, is an OSU alumna who has been actively engaged with her alma mater for many years. A gift from Allyn’s and Carmen’s late mother made possible the construction of the Hallie Ford Center for Healthy Children and Families – named in her honor – which celebrated its grand opening on Sept. 8. Allyn and Cheryl Ford are both highly involved with the Ford Family Foundation, which helps to fund OSU programs and outreach in the College of Public Health and Human Sciences. At any one time the foundation also provides scholarship support for more than 500 students in Oregon post-secondary schools.

“The Ford family and Roseburg Forest Products are deeply rooted in rural Oregon and they have had a tremendous impact on rural communities,” said OSU Provost and Executive Vice President Sabah Randhawa. “This deanship gift extends that legacy in a powerful way. Supporting College of Forestry leadership is a long-term investment not only in sustainable forests but in sustainable rural communities.”

Building on his predecessors’ legacy, Salwasser has led OSU’s nationally ranked College of Forestry for 12 years. The college has been ranked the number one forest resources research program in North America and the number one forest ecology program. It encompasses three departments, about 1,000 undergraduate and graduate students, and 14,000 acres of college forests.

Salwasser is also executive dean of OSU’s Division of Earth Systems Science, which includes the colleges of forestry, agricultural sciences, and oceanic and atmospheric sciences. Prior to his arrival at OSU in 2000, Salwasser held numerous positions with the U.S. Forest Service. He holds a doctorate in wildland resource science from the University of California, Berkeley.

In honoring Salwasser as the inaugural holder of the endowed deanship, university officials also announced today that Salwasser will step down from the position at the end of the 2011-12 academic year.

“OSU has one of the finest forestry educational and research programs in the nation, a program that Oregon needs to build both a healthy economy and a healthy natural resource base,” Randhawa said.

“No one has understood these multiple demands better than Dr. Salwasser,” he said. “We’re grateful for his work, his leadership in the College of Forestry to align academic programs with needs of industry and society, and his efforts to increase collaboration across colleges in his role as executive dean of the Division of Earth Systems Science. The new endowment is a fitting capstone to his achievements and will ensure that we are able to recruit a leader of similar caliber to help write the next chapter of the college’s distinguished history.”

The gift is part of The Campaign for OSU, the university’s first comprehensive fundraising effort. Guided by OSU’s strategic plan, the campaign seeks $850 million to provide opportunities for students, strengthen the Oregon economy and conduct research that changes the world. Approximately $743 million has been committed to date, including more than $74 million toward a $97 million goal for endowed positions and other faculty support. Since 2004, campaign donors have doubled the number of endowed faculty positions at OSU.

The Fords’ gift leveraged the OSU Provost’s Faculty Match Program, an initiative designed to encourage donor investments in endowed faculty positions. Over five years the match on the Fords’ gift will provide an additional $450,000 for College of Forestry programs.

This is the third endowed deanship of OSU's 12 colleges, following established endowments in the colleges of business and veterinary medicine.

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Wood First Bill Gets Airtime


The Oregon Capitol played host on March 21, to local and international experts on top of the economic, employment and environmental benefits of the use of wood in construction of State funded buildings.  The House Agriculture and Natural Resource Committee heard two hours of testimony on House Bill 3429.

The Oregon Business Plan called for “(d)eveloping market opportunities for wood products, such as launching an ‘Oregon Wood First’ campaign for the state’s public buildings.”  Honorable Pat Bell, the British Columbia Minister of Jobs, Tourism & Innovation, spoke to the significant success of B.C.’s Wood First initiative.  The 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver showcased several wood buildings including the spectacular ice pavilion.

Allyn Ford, leader of his family-owned Roseburg Forest Products, and Andrew Miller, President of his family-owned Stimson Lumber Company presented compelling testimony regarding the employment benefits in rural communities of enhancing the production of Oregon wood products.  Bill Kluting, long-time advocate for the Carpenters Industrial Union, noted that not only have federal forests been neglected, but also Oregon’s own Elliott State Forest is biologically capable of producing twice as much timber as it has in the last decade.

Oregon’s vast Douglas fir and Ponderosa Pine forests give the timber industry inherent advantages in the manufacture of a variety of wood products for use in Oregon and throughout the world.  Experts from “Wood Works” and the University of Washington’s Consortium for Research on Renewable Industrial Materials spoke to the structural and carbon dioxide advantages of wood.